
There’s an art project going on in London which started on July 6th and will continue for 24 hours a day, for 100 days. The project is called “One & Other” by Antony Gormley.
It takes place on a 23 foot high stone statue plinth in Trafalgar Square in central London, not far from Charring Cross which is the official point from which all mileage measurements in the UK are taken. There are three other plinths in the square occupied by statues of King George IV, and two 19th-century generals Charles Napier and Henry Havelock. This fourth plinth has been empty since it was built in 1841 to support a statue of a horse, but funds were never made available to finish the project.
Gormley’s aim is to create a democratic work of art. One member of the public chosen randomly from the application web site is given the opportunity to stand on the plinth for an hour, to be replaced by another and another; continuously so that there will be 2400 “plinthers” (as they’ve been nicknamed) by the end of the project.
In an article by the Telegraph, Alistair Sooke says “One and Other is participatory, democratic and perfectly in tune with our reality-television age, which worships ordinary people for nothing other than being in the limelight.” Some people have just stood there with signs, a woman blew up and released helium balloons for a charity, a man dressed up as a town crier, others danced, a man had a cup of tea and another took photos of the crowd looking up at him.
Gormley says “My project is about trying to democratize this space of privilege, idealization and control. This is about putting one of us in the place of a political or military hero. It’s an opportunity to use this old instrument of hierarchical reinforcement for something a little bit more…” He pauses, searching for the right word: “Fun.” He goes on to ask some intriguing questions: “This is also me testing myself, calling into question everything that I’ve done. Is this sculpture or isn’t it? Can you use time as a medium? Can you use real life as a subject?”
The interview concludes that possibly as a result of the democratic message of his work, Gormley suffers a fraught relationship with the art establishment, who often look down on his output. Sookes asks if Gormley believes that he is the victim of critical snobbery. “I’m very – what is the right word? – suspect,” he says, with a bitter snigger. “There is still huge snobbery in this country and a division between high and low culture that means, yes, for me, it hasn’t been so clever being a news item as opposed to a critical item.”
Gormley wants to classify the project as a sculpture of life rendered in time, or is it just a form of performance art? Or is it art at all? In the words of “Rembrandt” who commented on the blog yesterday……“what is the artist trying to ‘say’”. I think he’s welcoming the ordinary person, by giving them an opportunity to become a part of what shouldn’t be but is, an elitist world of art.

For a live link up, statistics and record of the project go to the Guardian.